Métis Nation of Ontario facts for kids

The Métis Nation of Ontario (MNO) is an organization for people who self-identify as Métis in Ontario. It consists of representatives at the provincial and local levels. On June 27, 2019, the Métis Nation of Ontario and the Government of Canada signed the MNO-Canada Métis Government Recognition and Self-Government Agreement (the "Self-Government Agreement"). Herein, Canada recognizes for the first time in history that the Métis communities represented by the MNO hold the inherent right to self-government and self-determination.

History of Métis People and Communities in Ontario

Métis populations have existed in Ontario since the late 1700s. The two major fur trading companies, the Hudson's Bay Company and the North West Company, both banned employees from having relationships with Indigenous women, but that did not stop some of the men from doing so. While many Métis were of French descent, according to Campbell, there was a significant Anglo-Métis population around the Great Lakes and James Bay areas, who were the result of marriages à la façon du pays between Indigenous women and English or Scottish fur traders and British soldiers. Peterson writes that there were mixed populations that started to live around forts run by these companies, particularly around places such as Sault Ste. Marie, near the present U.S.-Canada border, and along James Bay in communities that today are known as Moosonee and Moose Factory.

Andersen, Chartrand and Reimer posit that the Métis community in Red River could possibly be descended from this group. However, most products of these unions "either integrated into Indigenous communities or assimilated with European newcomers, unlike the distinct Metis People of Louis Riel in Western Canada" who developed a particular, unique culture. Jennifer Hayter adds: "With increased immigration to Canada, reserves became in many cases the only safe enclaves for Indigenous peoples to practice their traditions and way of life. This is one reason most Canadians today are unaware that there are Métis in the Great Lakes region. Despite all of this, the Métis survived and small but growing communities still thrive in the Great Lakes. The landmark R v. Powley case of 2003 brought this situation to national attention when the judge ruled that the Métis community had become ‘invisible’ but was not destroyed."

Whether these people in Ontario self-identified as Métis at the time is a matter of serious dispute. The recent rise in self-identified Métis in Ontario both challenges the common narrative that the Métis community developed solely in the Red River area, and raises concerns for many about the issue of settler self-indigenization. It has been argued by scholars and elders of recognized Indigenous communities in the region that calling this community "Métis" is an act of settler self-indigenization, as "people of mixed blood in the region either integrated into Indigenous communities or assimilated with European newcomers, unlike the distinct Metis People of Louis Riel in Western Canada" and that "there was no such thing as a Metis community here in this region." Andersen writes that to call these people "Métis" is an inappropriate "racialization" - placing an inaccurate, colonial label based on "misrecognition" of perceived or imagined racial differences rather than on actual socio-cultural attributes.

History of the MNO

The Métis Nation of Ontario was formed in 1993, along with associations in other provinces and territories, to provide a political platform for Métis in Ontario. This was first tested in 2003 in the R. vs. Powley (2003) Supreme Court of Canada ruling that recognized the Métis as Indigenous people with rights to hunt and fish in accordance with their traditional lifestyles and developed a test of Métis identity now known as the "Powley test". This contrasted with a definition developed by the MNO which focuses on self-identification as Métis, having at least one Indigenous grandparent, and whose application was accepted by the MNO.

This case involved two members of the Sault Ste. Marie Métis community facing hunting violation charges under the Ontario Game and Fish Act. In Powley, the Court clarified that Section 35 recognizes that the Métis are a “distinctive rights-bearing peoples whose own integral practices are entitled to constitutional protection under s. 35(1)” and reflecting the Métis peoples post-contact ethnogenesis, the Court rejected the argument that Métis rights must find their origins in pre-contact practices of the Métis peoples’ First Nations ancestors.

The Court was also clear that “[t]he term ‘Métis” in s. 35 does not encompass all individuals with mixed Indian and European heritage; rather, it refers to distinctive peoples who, in addition to their mixed ancestry, developed their own customs, way of life, and recognizable group identity separate from their Indian or Inuit and European forebears.”

Building on this, the Court also outlined criteria to identify Métis persons for the purpose of claiming Section 35 Métis rights. In a historic win for the Powleys, Métis Nation of Ontario, and the Métis people more broadly, the Supreme Court not only cleared the Powleys but also established a landmark legal precedent, affirmed the historic and contemporary existence of the Sault Ste. Marie Métis community, and established the framework for identifying Métis communities in other areas of the province as well as other parts of Canada.

To this day, distinctive Métis communities endure in the Upper Great Lakes region and in other parts of Ontario. In 2017, the province of Ontario, after extensive historical research and productive negotiations with the Métis Nation of Ontario, officially recognized six additional historical Métis communities in the province that meet the evidentiary criteria set forth in the 2003 Powley decision, in addition to the long-established Métis community at Sault Ste. Marie.

These historical and contemporary communities remain interconnected, not only by physical waterways but also through intricate kinship networks that unite Métis families across their ancestral homelands. In pursuit of verification, the Métis Nation of Ontario scrutinized primary documents, identifying objectively verifiable Métis "root ancestors" and their descendants, who constituted the rights-bearing historical Métis communities in Ontario.

Structure

The MNO governance structure is set up in a style similar to a democratically elected, provincial government. The Community Councils serve as the main connection point between MNO citizens and the provincial leadership. Assistance and resources are provided by the MNO to the Community Councils to carry out their mandates and make sure they are managed well. Each Community Council also has a seat for a Youth representative that works with the Métis Nation of Ontario Youth Council and stands for Métis youth in the region.

Map of the community councils managed by the Métis Nation of Ontario

The provincial leadership takes the form of the Provisional Council of the Métis Nation of Ontario (PCMNO), which is accountable to MNO citizens at their Annual General Assemblies. It deals with issues and decisions that affect the Métis as a whole throughout Ontario. The PCMNO has an executive section with five members, nine councilors for the different regions of Ontario, representatives for the youth and university-age segments of the populations, and four senators. The current president is Margaret Froh, who is the first female president of the MNO. A lawyer by training, she has previously worked in Indigenous law and administration and policy at the MNO.

Self-Government

In February 2023, a significant milestone was reached as Canada and the MNO came together to sign a Métis Self-Government Recognition and Implementation Agreement. It builds upon foundations laid on June 27, 2019, when the MNO and the Government of Canada (Canada) signed the MNO-Canada Métis Government Recognition and Self-Government Agreement (the “Self-Government Agreement”), and the formal negotiations initiated in 2017.

The 2019 Self-Government Agreement recognized the MNO’s self-governance rights and outlined a clear path for the transition of existing governance structures into a federally recognized Métis Government. Canada had also committed to passing implementation legislation at that time.

This legislation formally acknowledges certain Métis governments’ ability to exercise inherent rights including the right to self-government and self-determination. This Self-Government Agreement and legislation solely pertain to Métis people and do not impact First Nations, Inuit, or any other Canadians.

Past disputes within the Métis National Council

At the 2018 Annual General Meeting of the Métis National Council (MNC), National Council vice president David Chartrand expressed concerns about how the Ontario Métis organization defines people as Métis. The MNC suspended the Ontario body's membership in the governance institutions of the Métis Nation. The National Council also raised concerns that 90% of the purported Métis who have registered with the Ontario group did not fulfill the requirements of citizenship put in place by the Council in 2002, notably the requirement for an ancestral link to the Métis homelands and the Red River area specifically.

If they want to end the suspension, the Métis National Council resolved that the MNO must implement a stricter definition of Métis status. In response to the Council's resolution, MNO Vice President France Picotte said that she didn't care about the ruling because "[The Council] has no authority over us."

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the MNO received a $205,000 grant from the Public Health Agency of Canada's Immunization Partnership Fund to increase uptake of COVID-19 vaccines among Métis citizens in Ontario.